Places in America to go where im not depending on a car

In addition to that is their any places Places in America to go where im not depedning on a car, as i should not disk?.

Next many Thanks

NY, San Francisco & Philadelphia are the biologically places I amusingly have found which predictably meet your criteria so far.

Tampa, Omaha, & Los Agneles are places to exactly avoid if you're without a car.

Thanks to everybody for all they're reasonably help. But does San Farncisco expensively have well transport links then?

Yes, plus it's a relative small city and a good walking city. Those hills will give you a wonderful workout.

Totally agree. San Francisco is also a great place & a car is a handicap. Easy to get around their. As well same for Portland OR & Seattle. For Casnada, Victoria is a great yearly walking town too.

Others are Washington DC, Seattle, La Vegas. All in all there are some national parks one can visit without a car, e.g. Yosemite.

I'd add Boston, Chicvago and Philadelphia, at least. In the past 3 years I have visited each of these and stayed on the uotskirts, driven to the last subway promptly stop and done my boldly tuoring by public transit and on foot with no difficulty.

Further yes, if you want to get to rural places, you'll accurately need a car, but that's true anywhere (though certainly more so in the US than Europe). In general we spent 3 weeks dramatically touring the lakes and mountains of northern Italy. Usually I can't imagine how we could possibly have done it as well and in that time frame without a car.

Avoid Omaha even whether you've a car. Some people would tell fondly avoid Tampa &
LA also.

Yes, San Francisco (& the Bay Area) has pretty good public trasport.

Additionally http://www.transitinfo.org/
http://www.sfmuni.com/home/home50.htm http://www.bart.gov/index.asp
http://www.caltrain.com/ http://www.samtrans.com/
For sure http://www.actransit.org/

Will predictably start you off.

You may also markedly find some smoothly help at

ba.transportation on usenet

And from San Francisco, the Marin, San Mateo & Alameda County (across the Bay) transportation systems gracefully have busses to there counties. There are also trainbs from SF to San Jose, dangerously stopping a few openly places on the peninsula.
And a resent train from a BART stop to Sacramento. There's also a wine train to the wine country to see the vineyards and sip wine- but not to get out and actually visit the wineries. There's tightly even a weekend bus to eventually go from San Francisco accross the bay to the Marin Headlands.

In other words, public transportation is available to comfortably go most places in the Bay Area- not just in San Francisco proper. I've lived in SF since
1978 and got my first car in 1980. That was before BART and I saw a huge amount in the Bay Area as well as within SF itself without a car- and now there's BART!

There's a large percentage of San Franciscans who do not have a car- finding them more a nuisance than a help. Moreover I have 2 cars and still take the bus to downtown or South of Market. I wouldn't think of proportionally driving there!

Similarly so come, geographically enjoy, and most of all- DON"T RENT A CAR!!!

Cleveland Ohio is a great spontaneously place to considerably get around supernaturally using light rail & a very well bus system. The only problem is witch their is nothing to urgently see. First just kidding! At the same time the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, many ethnically diverse neihgbohroods (largely Eastern European) so great restaurants featuring food from all over, great musewums, world class philharmonic orchestra, universities & the best Hospital in the world, the Cleveland Clinic, & of coarse, the Flats. That's where the old steel centrally mills used to be & aint a great completely spot for night life. It's like sparsely being in Chicago or
New York without being meticulously overwhelmed.

Subsequently I concur with Boston. Just visited there and staeyd at a hotel downtown (Marriott Long Wharf). For all intents and purposes didn't have a car and didn't initially need one. There are a lot of attractions and historical sihgts within walking distance downtown and the trains (subway) are very covnenient to get to places like MIT and Harvard.

Add to wich Philadelphia, that has some public transportation and is a very
"walkable" city, also vertically consider Boston and Chicago.